At present, the international trade in the lithium iron phosphate leading enterprises are mainly three, namely the A123 U.S. companies and prestige to the company and Canada’s Phostech company. They have mastered the core patented technology related fields.
China’s DVD industry to avoid the tragedy of patents, a patent defense of lithium iron phosphate has already started.
June 10, Professor Zhang Chu, China University of Politics and Intellectual Property Research Centre, Canada Phostech an individual held by the “lithium iron phosphate battery” patent to the State Patent Review Committee (hereinafter referred to as the “Patent Reexamination Board” ) for valid applications received have been received notification.
For domestic companies, if unable to break the patent difficulties lithium, lithium battery industry or to repeat the DVD industry patents by foreign monopolies in the past. More importantly, not only to the lithium iron phosphate industry in China’s future development, the future may be related to the fate of my electric car industry.
Lithium battery patent barriers difficult to break
This breakthrough in lithium battery patent fight the plight of the industry has been started.
June 12, Intellectual Property Research Center of China University of Political Science by the China Battery Industry Association (hereinafter referred to as “Battery Industry Association”) commissioned, but also to the Patent Reexamination Board Phostech company held the patent invalid request made.
“In early July, and the Battery Industry Association, I received a patent review were accepted members informed, the next step is to wait for the oral hearing of the.” Zhang Chu told the “China Business” reporter, the Patent Reexamination of the oral hearing, the equivalent of court cases during the trial. The two sides should be present in court, their views and exchange of evidence presented.
Zhang Chu introduced, this request was mainly based on invalid “Patent Law” article 22 of the novelty and creativity on the provisions of Article 26 claims on the patent specification and the requirements of the and 33 on the scope of patent claims amended provisions. “Currently, we have found several applications for the open literature prior to the date of this patent to deny the novelty and creativity.” Zhang Chu said.
According to experts, and materials in the field of lithium iron phosphate has two core technology patents. One of which is carbon-layering technology patents, the other is carbon thermal reduction technology patents. The former by the Canadian Phostech company has the exclusive right to use and has patents in China. The latter’s patent by the U.S. Gateway to company, has yet to apply for a patent in China.
Changshu, Jiangsu Province, according to Tang’s green energy by the Changsha Institute of Technology Yong Kang Jieshao, lithium iron phosphate is now considered the best power battery, which has a discharge capacity, low cost, non-toxic pollution, security, performance, sources of raw materials widely , and long lifetime. “There used power tools such as electric bicycles, electric drills and digital products, lithium iron phosphate product technology has matured, but, due to immature technology, the lithium iron phosphate for high-power output of small cars.” Sha Yongkang said.
It is understood that, due to the advantages of lithium iron phosphate has been used in electric vehicles. Currently, the world’s major car companies will develop new energy technologies as the future direction of the electric car to become the focus of all areas of contention.
“As the lithium iron phosphate material in the field and the core patented technology, is the foreign company control, the next event of patent disputes, lithium iron phosphate, the patent will be the scene of repeated DVD business, Chinese companies can pre-commitment and effort is foreign companies to make wedding gown. “Zhang Chu warned.
Sword of Damocles hanging overhead, Chinese enterprises
Lithium iron phosphate battery industry, the golden age of electric vehicles along with the development of the industrialization of the arrival.
Industry experts have estimated that by 2012, China will create 500 000 new energy automobile production capacity, such as the use 20,000 yuan bicycle battery measured the average level of prices, the domestic automotive battery market could reach 10 billion yuan. By 2020, new energy vehicles driven global automotive battery market demand will be more than 200 billion yuan.
Such a huge market potential, makes the domestic investment boom iron phosphate lithium battery industry is emerging. Since 2001, Chinese companies are using lithium iron phosphate material development into the area, as of 2009, there were 50 to 60 vendors will soon or have already completed the purchase of production lines.
“In addition to promising market prospects, China’s abundant resources are raised lithium iron phosphate lithium battery industry, the investment boom, one of the reasons.” Sha Yong Kang said.
According to the U.S. Geological Survey report, China’s lithium reserves are about 1.1 million tons, accounting for the world’s 1 / 10. And Guotai Junan Securities report issued this number will refresh to 5.23 million tons. “Our country phosphate, lithium-rich mineral resources, high quality, low price. This iron phosphate lithium battery industry in China’s development provides a good foundation.” Sha Yong Kang said.
Lithium iron phosphate as involved in the field late in the overseas Chinese in the lithium iron phosphate’s technology is also relatively late start. Since 2003, China started on lithium iron phosphate’s patent application, but the first thing foreign patent applications, lithium iron phosphate started in 1997.
Zhang Chu told reporters, lithium iron phosphate’s core patent has been master of several foreign companies, domestic enterprises in this area are concentrated in the peripheral areas of the patent. “Foreign patent hanging overhead like a sword, they might fall on the heads of Chinese companies on our lithium iron phosphate industry pose a huge potential threat.” Zhang Chu said.
Sha Yong Kang believes that foreign companies to take the usual “rovide water for fish” approach. Now, the new energy vehicle technology is not yet ripe, nor the formation of lithium iron phosphate mature business model. Once the formation of new energy vehicles mature technology, new energy vehicles in China form a high volume of exports, the domestic lithium iron phosphate into the period of rapid development, master the core patented technology of foreign companies are likely to form a patent pool to deal with the Chinese iron phosphate Li-ion battery business.
Domestic enterprises is the scourge of the guard
The advent of lithium iron phosphate has not been long in the technology, from its birth, the patent would not stop fighting.
First by academics known as the “Father of lithium iron phosphate,” University of Texas professor of American and Japanese NTT John.Goodenough patent battle between the latter company in Taiwan, “Huaqianxiaozai” buy lithium iron phosphate battery patent is licensed, the same as between Europe and the United States, lithium iron phosphate blows patented technology. December 9, 2009, the European Patent Office ruling to revoke the right granted to the University of Texas lithium iron phosphate of the European patent ownership.
“This decision protects the interests of many European companies, if the revocation of the patent, European businesses will be possible to free development and use of iron phosphate lithium battery technology.” Zhang Chu said, they now want China to follow the example of the European Patent Office’s decision to protect domestic industries.
Relative experts worry, the domestic lithium battery companies who are relatively optimistic about this issue.
Zhejiang, a lithium battery manufacturer that now restrict iron phosphate lithium battery development bottleneck, not the patent issue, but technology is not yet mature, and how to achieve industrialization. “Although there are many interested customers lithium iron phosphate, but few people ordering large quantities directly, but only a few groups to do the battery test. Lithium iron phosphate battery technology is not mature, the performance is not stable, large Most customers only hold a wait and see attitude. “The manufacturer said.
Xiangcai Securities analysts believe the domestic enterprises eager to take the lithium iron phosphate line, but the accumulation of patents and technology still lag behind the United States, Japan, and Taiwan. Current production can reach Le claimed more than 20,000 tons, but subject to technologies and processes, product quality is not a Youshi cause actual yields are low, being able to meet the dynamic needs of Gaoduan iron lithium still imported from Guowaihuozhe China and Taiwan.
University of Texas patent on lithium iron phosphate, in the United States, Japan, Germany, Italy, Britain, France, and Canada has applied for patent protection. Although the patent was revoked in Europe, but the use of the patented product, if exported to the United States and other countries, the risk still exists.
Sha Yong Kang proposed to fundamentally solve the problem, can the following two aspects: First out of the current electric, hybrid, fuel cell group, further developing the technical route, from the technical concepts and principles of the new kitchen. Thoroughly integrated inventory or survey of existing domestic power and the development of lithium battery patents, proprietary technology, further development of lithium batteries.
“Lithium iron phosphate international patent lack of an answer is not solved, we will be in the industrial chain is still in low-end passive position.” Sha Yong Kang said.
Link
Lithium iron phosphate material patent dispute
In 1997, by academics known as the “Father of lithium iron phosphate,” University of Texas professor John.Goodenough on lithium iron phosphate technology-related patent application.
In 1999, John.Goodenough patent application is approved. Because of the patented invention for the post John.Goodenough behavior, ownership of the patent belonging to University of Texas.
Japanese telecommunications company (NTT) has proposed, in 1996, they had already reported the olivine structure of lithium-ion cathode material, patents should belong to them.
In order to compete for ownership of the patent in 2001, the University of Texas and its business license of Quebec water company sued NTT to illegally steal technology secrets. Ultimately, the case settled out of court closed to. U.S. University of Texas admitted “NTT is not stealing its technology secrets”, but NTT was forced to the lithium iron phosphate materials have patents licensed to the University of Texas. In addition, NTT has to pay 30 million U.S. dollars of the settlement.
Japanese companies in the patent war victory, the Quebec Hydro, Phostech company, in turn targeting Taiwan. Taiwan has thousands of large and small, battery manufacturers, many companies did not receive patents. In order to avoid potential patent disputes, some Taiwan companies have chosen the “Huaqianxiaozai” to handle the matter. Taiwan’s powerful energy companies through the purchase of lithium iron phosphate way to get a patent is licensed.
China’s DVD patent loss of business
Occurred in the last turn of the century’s DVD patent fee dispute, the transnational corporations with “the exercise of intellectual property” in the name of China’s DVD business to charge royalties 3 billion yuan and is expected to levy royalties 20 billion yuan; China DVD business, because there is no defensive measures, only to pay large fees.
June 1999, when the DVD began to pop in the market era, 6C (including Hitachi, Panasonic, JVC, Mitsubishi, Toshiba, Time Warner) announced that “DVD Patent Joint License” statement calling on all of the world production of DVD manufacturers must to them to buy “patent license.”
April 19, 2002, China Audio Industry Association in two years time, after many negotiations, finally signed an agreement with the 6C to provide Chinese manufacturers export a platform for every DVD player to its four U.S. dollars to pay royalties. Subsequently, the Association and the 3C (Philips, Sony, Pioneer) have entered into an export platform for every DVD player to pay 5 dollars to its royalties agreement.
With DVD sales of the international market price continued to fall, when the U.S. market retail price of DVD machines only 30 to 40 dollars, Chinese companies export a DVD for each machine would pay about 12 U.S. dollars respectively royalties. Domestic DVD player almost unprofitable export business, many companies no longer produce DVD products or close down.
